General chatter

Welcome to the latest addition to Random Film Stuff.

Got a comment not related to a specific review? Seen a film you want to recommend (or anti-recommend)? Just want to say ‘hi’?

This is the place for off-topic chat!

This entry was posted in Random film stuff. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to General chatter

  1. lyzmadness says:

    While I don’t mind at all when review comments go off-topic (like my Amityville Playhouse review devolving into a discussion of the finer points of chicken-fried steak and Chiko rolls), I know that sometimes people have something to say but aren’t sure where to say it. This page is now the place for all those random observations!

    Like

  2. DennisMM says:

    Mz. Lyz, a passing observation: I do wish (as do you, obviously, to a much greater degree) that you hadn’t suffered such travails at the old site. Once I discovered it, I was happily surprised to see that so many more of your reviews existed there. I was then saddened to see that the technical problems you mentioned on the front page have rendered half or more inaccessible. Many thanks to you for getting past that — quite a blow, I would imagine — for your continuing work to keep AYCYAS going, and for your love of genre film. Above all else, thank you for what you bring to your reviews themselves: wit, technical knowledge, sentimentality where appropriate, scorn where appropriate, and a mildly dirty mind at all times.

    Enough sucking up. Have you seen “Session 9,” from 2001? Peter Mullan and David Caruso (who demonstrates here that he can act, damn it!) play the owner and lead worker of a small asbestos mitigation crew working on an insane deadline to clear an abandoned psychiatric hospital. Shot at an actual abandoned psychiatric hospital. The film is greatly underappreciated and, sadly, almost unknown. I think you might enjoy it.

    Soon, I may write about how your review of “Truly, Madly, Deeply” at the old site reduced me to shattered tears, although that might better be revealed in a more private venue, such as an email.

    “Geronimo!” as the Eleventh Doctor would say.

    Like

    • Dawn says:

      Session 9 was great. Best line, “you really need to wake up now.”
      I read in IMDB that there was a whole subplot taken out, of who (or what) was actually doing the possession. I think it’s more effective to have that completely unexplained.

      Liked by 2 people

      • DennisMM says:

        AH AAM AHWAKEH!

        Like

      • DennisMM says:

        SPOILERS!!!

        The special features on the disc reveal that the script went into some detail about the malevolent spirit, but that was kept as obscure as possible, in the final film. What’s amazing is that they cut scenes that had been filmed of a demented homeless woman who was living in the hospital before Gordon’s crew came along. There were multiple shots from her POV, and she appeared briefly in others. Even wonder what happened to the worker found dead in the great hall?

        Like

      • Dawn says:

        How effective would an alarm be with that phrase instead of a bell?

        Liked by 1 person

    • lyzmadness says:

      Thank you for getting so thoroughly into the spirit of things, Dennis! šŸ™‚

      Those reviews are inaccessible (at the moment), but they’re not lost: the moving-over process will continue to tick along, though admittedly at a pace dictated by external circumstances; and I will continue to find opportunities to give the earlier pieces a good overhaul as required, as I did with The Creeping Flesh.

      I haven’t seen Session 9 yet, but of course it’s On The List. (Oddly enough, I had an episode of CSI: Miami on when you posted this.)

      Yes…haven’t had the heart to revisit TMD, for obvious reasons; it was hard enough the first time around. But as with everything else, it *will* get rolled over here…one day

      Liked by 1 person

    • I’ve been able to access some of the older reviews–such as “Alien”–by using the Internet Archive (the Wayback Machine).

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Dawn says:

    I just watched ‘Cat People’ and ‘Curse of the Cat People’. (October scheduling – love it). I don’t understand how the same man could be so incredibly patient and understanding in the first movie (his wife tells him on their wedding night that there will be no intimacy of any kind until she’s ready, and he waits for what seems to be months), and in the second movie, tells his 6-yr-old daughter, “If you’re a good girl, I’ll love you.”
    Both are great movies, but I wanted to slap him upside the head in the second one.

    Like

    • lyzmadness says:

      But he never really understands; he just forbears. For a while.

      And most likely the lesson he took away from the first events was not to encourage other people’s nonsense. (By that point, he’d probably rationalised himself out of believing his own eyes…)

      Like

      • Dawn says:

        Just the fact that he forbears is exceptional.
        Yes, he does say a few times about what can happen if a person is left to fantasize too much. but at one point, he tells his daughter she’s lying, when she says she passed an old dark house. The house exists, and is just a few blocks away. That seems a little over-reacting.
        Of course, at that time, parents often made their love conditional on their children’s behavior. Not recommended now. My parents never said anything like that, but the phrase, “I’m not mad, just disappointed” can still send chills down my spine.

        Like

  4. Jim says:

    But where do we talk about popcorn??

    I mean, the reviews are the main attraction, that’s the Major Chatter. This is for the General Chatter. In the absence of promotion or demotion, shouldn’t there be a spot for Colonel Chatter? Maybe all movie refreshments go there, not just talk of popcorn kernels? And if a movie about Harvey Milk bombs, is that a Milk dud and goes in colonel chatter, or general chatter? There has to be another thread or we’d be forced to talk in private, which only leads to more questions on rank and where it goes and if it gets another thread.

    It’s all very confusing.

    (And on a more serious note. I actually timed my sleep schedule out to watch Doc Savage: Man of Bronze 2:30-4:00am. The sacrifices we make for our love of movies. No comments about Monk’s pet pig are forthcoming until the food thread issues are clarified.)

    Like

    • lyzmadness says:

      RIGHT. HERE.

      While my email address opens up the possibility of Private Chatter.

      Like

      • therevdd says:

        I’m glad you made a point to say the discursions on movie threads are still fine; otherwise I’d be in serious trouble! Still, this is a neat idea.

        Oh, be sure to let everyone know how often Private Chatter goes AWOL, my dear.

        *coughs*

        *runs and hides*

        Like

      • Jim says:

        If Private Chatter goes AWOL it could lead to discussions of physical punishment enacted on the abuser, thus turning it into Corporal Chatter.

        Like

      • lyzmadness says:

        So basically you guys have made up your minds to make me regret this?? šŸ˜€

        Like

      • therevdd says:

        If you haven’t regretted me being in your life by this point, it’s too late for you, hon. šŸ˜›

        Honestly, though, that was just too perfect a set-up.

        Would it help if I told you I adored you? Or that the T-Fest piece is nearing completion, which means I can soon get back to the next book review?

        Like

  5. Jim says:

    I will use this for its intended purpose even though I had a couple more military rank puns involving Dick Sargent and Land of The Lost, Rick Marshall.

    I watched Jigoku on TCM and didn’t know if it would be appropriate to put it in the House thread as it was as close as I could get.

    I am confused. The title may mean Hell. Or it may have been released under multiple titles. Or there may be subtitle mistranslation (think Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah Ragos/Lagos Island). The opening scene is a classroom setting discussing the concept of Hell. It’s explained that the word “naraku” is derived from the Sanskrit word for hell. I decided not to bother Googling since I figured my brain would explode with more confusion than clarification. I do know Ben said an alternate title was Sinners of Hell.

    I enjoyed it, but was distracted. It made me yearn for a badly dubbed English language version where the lips don’t match the words.

    Anyone remember the old SNL skit Kramer vs. Godzilla?

    Like

  6. KeithB says:

    The new (I guess) comet network is having a “Catyclysm” On Oct 29th – A wicked kitty Marathon.

    Just thought you might want to know… 8^)

    Like

  7. Jim says:

    It’s:
    Tomb of Ligeia
    Cat People
    Curse of The Cat People
    Stephen King’s Cat’s Eye

    All except the first I’ve seen recently on TCM, without commercials. So no big deal for me that Comcast in my area doesn’t have Comet.

    Like

  8. DennisMM says:

    Whilst reading about Bela Lugosi, I discovered that YouTube has (admittedly poor prints of) both “Bela Lugosi Meets a Brooklyn Gorilla” (AKA “The Boys from Brooklyn”) and “Vampire Over London” (originally released as “Old Mother Riley Meets the Vampire” in the UK and in the U.S.A., years later, as “My Son the Vampire.”) They are difficult to watch, but they are significant, I think, as documentation of what happened to Lugosi in later years but before his time working with Edward D. Wood. The story behind “Vampire Over London” is especially sad.

    Like

  9. Jim says:

    Curse of the Demon:

    1). Another killer kitteh!

    2). Is there a name for the font used in the credits? Looks like little licks of flame on the characters.

    Like

  10. Just wanted to say–again–that you and Ken Begg are probably responsible for me buying more films than I care to comment upon. The difference being that I know Ken’s “recommendations” are going to be painful, while yours are generally more positive. The Japanese “House” and the American “Child’s Play” are two recent examples. I haven’t finished rewatching “House” yet–I find the piano score really annoying–but “Child’s Play” turned out to be very taut and suspenseful. You should set up a DVD store, or at least have a list of films “Lyz Approved!” or something.

    Like

  11. Jim says:

    Unnecessary question #437

    From Secret Screams

    Ghosthunter Dude:
    Have the spirit appearances been more frequent or increasing in intensity?

    Distressed Woman: Yes. Why? IS THAT BAD??

    Like

    • Dawn says:

      Just think of how many other ways you can phrase that question –
      Have the —
      earthquakes? heart attacks? nose bleeds? volcanic eruptions? shark attacks? visits from your mother-in-law? dinosaurs? fainting spells? cracks in walls? gunshots? zombies? chicken fried steaks?
      been more frequent or increasing in intensity?
      Yes. Why? IS THAT BAD?

      Feel free to add your own.

      Like

      • Jim says:

        Both parts of the dialogue are weak. For example:

        Have the pixies continued to do nothing to harm you, mended your shoes, put a gold coin under your pillow each morning, invented a delicious new ice cream flavor and prevented Justin Beiber from booking a concert in town this weekend?
        Yes. Why? IS THAT GOOD??

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s